
Brandon Badraoui/Lumen via Getty Images
IMSA set to hold drivers more accountable following recent dust-ups
Three weeks on from IMSA’s six-hour endurance race at Road America – a race littered with nine full-course yellows for incidents and plagued with controversies before and after the race – the sanctioning body's Senior VP of Competition Simon Hodgson and Race Director Beaux Barfield met with members of the media at VIRginia International Raceway to discuss how the series responded and what comes next.
Hodgson and Barfield made it clear that its drivers will be under tighter scrutiny to meet the competition committee’s expectations for fair racing going forward, similar to last year when IMSA took a stricter stance against instances of drivers not leaving racing room, blocking and making avoidable contact.
“[It was] disappointing to see the number of potentially avoidable incidents we had, both single-car incidents and multi-car incidents,” said Hodgson, “so there’s been a lot of questions that have arisen out of that.
“I think the priority for IMSA is obviously safety, the second is ensuring the competition is fair. We recognize that IMSA competition is tough. Sometimes it can be aggressive but in the case of WeatherTech, with the very nature of the four classes running together, cars running at different speeds, taking different lines in traffic, it’s complicated. But IMSA’s messaging has always been, and will be moving forward: You need to race responsibly, and you need to provide the competitor you’re racing with racing room.
“What we want to state here is that the regulations aren’t broken. What we’re seeing is some behavior starting to escalate. IMSA understands its responsibility in stating clearly to the competitors where that line is. I feel that message has been delivered already; however, we saw nine full-course yellows in Road America, which certainly isn’t what any of us wanted.”
Barfield, for his part, admitted that the series had made an adjustment to relax its enforcement on driving standards at the start of 2026, versus the end of 2025. These changes had led to quality racing in the early rounds of the WeatherTech SportsCar Championship, right up until the recent six-hour enduros at Watkins Glen and Road America.
“It felt like we were getting good buy-in, we were having some good races, and then things just seemed to sort of come undone at the last two races for all classes together,” said Barfield, who also declared an incident at Watkins Glen between the No. 31 Cadillac Whelen V-Series.R and No. 21 AF Corse Ferrari 296 as a “missed opportunity” when looking at it between Watkins Glen and Road America.
“One thing I had stated to the competitors is this puts me in a position to give a lot less benefit of the doubt. In fact, I said in the drivers’ meeting that I’m pretty much a ‘smoking gun’ type of person: You have to have absolute hard, clear evidence to make any kind of call,” Barfield said. “And this put us in a position potentially to use a little bit more conjecture and connect some dots to arrive at penalties to get the kind of accountability that we need on track. That’s a statement that I made that was outside of the norm of maybe the last 10 years or so have been, when we got to Road America.
“I don’t feel like we’re changing anything other than to restate those positions: We want to call things tight because expectations aren’t being met on track that are in line with what we want the product to be.”
This weekend’s race at VIR will be exclusive to the GTD Pro and GTD classes, and when the GTP and LMP2 classes return next month at Indianapolis, the premier class could be the one where drivers are most heavily scrutinized based on what was seen in their last two races.
“Simon challenged me a couple of days ago to take a snapshot of all of the incidents that were reviewed, and look at them in a different way,” Barfield explained. “And when I put them on a piece of paper, I looked at every car number and every class of all the incidents, I thought – frankly, we always poke fun at the P2 guys, they’re not the problem. All of our racing is intense, but GT can be over-the-top in ways – they were pretty well-behaved.
“It looks like we have a GTP problem, just at Road America. Based on this challenge, I plan on going back in the season and creating a pretty big spreadsheet to track all of this in a way that’s helpful for us to address specifically.
“This weekend is with GT guys. Does that mean we don’t have a problem and we won’t have problems? No, but I feel like I should pat them on the back and say, ‘Road America wasn’t pretty, but good job to you guys. Let’s keep that theme alive here at VIR and then we’ll go to Indy with the rest of them and see what we’ve got.”
GTP at Road America in particular was marred by the race-ending collision between the No. 6 Porsche Penske Motorsport 963 of Kévin Estre and the No. 31 Whelen Cadillac of Jack Aitken. Estre, for his role, was put on probation for the remainder of his 2026 campaign, but not immediately suspended for a race.
“If there was any discussion about suspension, that was not in line with precedent that had been established over the last 10 years,” Barfield said about the disciplinary action taken. “The precedent for an offense like this, with the history that we’ve had with these teams and drivers, was such that it was more in line with probation.”
But Barfield did warn that a repeat of the events of last race would warrant a violation of Estre’s probation.
“He’s on an an extremely short leash that could lead to him serving the remainder of his probation on the sideline,” he said of Estre. “That’s the intent. That’s the purpose. In terms of trying to give you some understanding on how long that leash is, I think that would be pretty difficult. But if he’s involved in similar on-track incidents, then I think he’ll be finished pretty quickly.”
Hodgson also responded to criticism which has been levied at IMSA as it pertains to the recent incidents involving the No. 31 Cadillac. After receiving no further penalties for both the incident at Watkins Glen with the AF Corse Ferrari, and then with the No. 7 Penske Porsche of Felipe Nasr at Road America, some have suggested the potential for a conflict of interest between IMSA and Action Express Racing, which is part-owned by NASCAR Chairman Jim France.
“The way the regulations, processes and protocols are established, that doesn’t play into any decision making at all,” said Hodgson. “We’re not subject to any kind of outside pressure, influence, or conjecture that people may have an opinion or perception of. We judge each incident independently. We don’t look at who it is, and we don’t take external feedback in those times. We recognize the responsibility IMSA has to maintain its competition integrity, and all those processes are established in that manner.
“I think it’s occurred in some other series as well, where there might be that perception from some people. Certainly, we can assure you, and anybody else that the process is insulated completely, and based on direct assessment by the race directors, by the driver advisors in the room, in consideration of regulations and prior precedent.”
RJ O’Connell
Read RJ O’Connell's articles
Latest News
Comments
Comments are disabled until you accept Social Networking Cookies. Update cookie preferences
If the dialog doesn't appear, ad-blockers are often the cause; try disabling yours or see our Social Features Support.





